<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t Rich People Go On Murder Sprees In a System of Private Law?&#8221;: Reply to Bob Murphy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/08/18/rich-people-murder-sprees-in-a-system-of-private-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/08/18/rich-people-murder-sprees-in-a-system-of-private-law/</link>
	<description>Austro-Anarchist Libertarian Legal Theory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:06:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is it ok for teachers to use corporal punishment? Discuss. &#124; Autonoblogger</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/08/18/rich-people-murder-sprees-in-a-system-of-private-law/comment-page-1/#comment-11351</link>
		<dc:creator>Is it ok for teachers to use corporal punishment? Discuss. &#124; Autonoblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=2356#comment-11351</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t Rich People Go On Murder Sprees In a System of Private Law?&#8221;: Reply to B... (stephankinsella.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t Rich People Go On Murder Sprees In a System of Private Law?&#8221;: Reply to B&#8230; (stephankinsella.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morey</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/08/18/rich-people-murder-sprees-in-a-system-of-private-law/comment-page-1/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>morey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=2356#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll offer a comment on the &quot;pacifist libertarian view&quot; of jurisdiction.  I agree with you in principle, but I doubt that this would ever be used in practice.

In a libertarian society, there is no commons.  From the roads you travel, to the restaurants, to the workplace, and so on, nearly every route, destination and trade would likely require a TOS agreement and some sort of liability coverage in order to participate.  

My guess is that in most cases, that agreement and coverage for most places would be in place by virtue of membership to a defense agency belonging to a network, similar to the way that my ATM card works at banks belonging to any of the major bank networks.  

Where a property owner or a potential customer want to do business, and either of them lack membership in a common network, the risk-averse person would likely insist on a special agreement for that particular transaction. 

To my way of thinking, there is little possibility of interacting with people who aren&#039;t subject to a consistent minimum code of conduct without knowingly forfeiting your own coverage during that interaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll offer a comment on the &#8220;pacifist libertarian view&#8221; of jurisdiction.  I agree with you in principle, but I doubt that this would ever be used in practice.</p>
<p>In a libertarian society, there is no commons.  From the roads you travel, to the restaurants, to the workplace, and so on, nearly every route, destination and trade would likely require a TOS agreement and some sort of liability coverage in order to participate.  </p>
<p>My guess is that in most cases, that agreement and coverage for most places would be in place by virtue of membership to a defense agency belonging to a network, similar to the way that my ATM card works at banks belonging to any of the major bank networks.  </p>
<p>Where a property owner or a potential customer want to do business, and either of them lack membership in a common network, the risk-averse person would likely insist on a special agreement for that particular transaction. </p>
<p>To my way of thinking, there is little possibility of interacting with people who aren&#8217;t subject to a consistent minimum code of conduct without knowingly forfeiting your own coverage during that interaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Libertarian Approach to Negligence, Tort, and Strict Liability: Wergeld and Partial Wergeld &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/08/18/rich-people-murder-sprees-in-a-system-of-private-law/comment-page-1/#comment-2236</link>
		<dc:creator>The Libertarian Approach to Negligence, Tort, and Strict Liability: Wergeld and Partial Wergeld &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=2356#comment-2236</guid>
		<description>[...] as noted above (see also &#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t Rich People Go On Murder Sprees In a System of Private Law?&#8221;: Reply to B...), the punishment-based approach solves the &#8220;rich man&#8221; problem that some libertarians [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as noted above (see also &#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t Rich People Go On Murder Sprees In a System of Private Law?&#8221;: Reply to B&#8230;), the punishment-based approach solves the &#8220;rich man&#8221; problem that some libertarians [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Libertarian Approach to Negligence, Tort, and Strict Liability: Wergeld and Partial Wergeld</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/08/18/rich-people-murder-sprees-in-a-system-of-private-law/comment-page-1/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>The Libertarian Approach to Negligence, Tort, and Strict Liability: Wergeld and Partial Wergeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=2356#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>[...] as noted above (see also “Wouldn’t Rich People Go On Murder Sprees In a System of Private Law?”: Reply to Bob Murphy), the punishment-based approach solves the &#8220;rich man&#8221; problem that some libertarians [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as noted above (see also “Wouldn’t Rich People Go On Murder Sprees In a System of Private Law?”: Reply to Bob Murphy), the punishment-based approach solves the &#8220;rich man&#8221; problem that some libertarians [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
