Comments on: Sad Patent Attorney Comments http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/10/02/sa-patent-attorney-comments/ Austro-Anarchist Libertarian Legal Theory Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:08:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: attorney http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/10/02/sa-patent-attorney-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-9591 attorney Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:23:09 +0000 http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=3376#comment-9591 I do not think you or Quinn are interested in truth at all. I could be wrong–but in this case, it just means you have very dull minds. I don’t think you do, so think it more likely that you don’t care about the truth and are just arguing li I do not think you or Quinn are interested in truth at all. I could be wrong–but in this case, it just means you have very dull minds. I don’t think you do, so think it more likely that you don’t care about the truth and are just arguing li

]]> By: How to Patent and Idea | ALIVEST http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/10/02/sa-patent-attorney-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-8937 How to Patent and Idea | ALIVEST Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:27:24 +0000 http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=3376#comment-8937 [...] Sad Patent Attorney Comments (stephankinsella.com) [...] [...] Sad Patent Attorney Comments (stephankinsella.com) [...]

]]> By: Stephan Kinsella http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/10/02/sa-patent-attorney-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3877 Stephan Kinsella Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:19:47 +0000 http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=3376#comment-3877 Mr. Halling, my accusations are not vague in the slightest. I believe you are intellectually unequipped to debate these matters in a sophisticated way. I don't mean this personally, but that is my opinion, based on reading your comments. I think there is a reason for this--the fallacious scientism that engineers are steeped in, and which most unthinkingly accept. I do not think you understand economics, or how to argue properly for value-related propositions or norms without conflating it with causal-factual matters. In fact, to be honest, I do not think you or Quinn are interested in truth at all. I could be wrong--but in this case, it just means you have very dull minds. I don't think you do, so think it more likely that you don't care about the truth and are just arguing li Mr. Halling, my accusations are not vague in the slightest. I believe you are intellectually unequipped to debate these matters in a sophisticated way. I don’t mean this personally, but that is my opinion, based on reading your comments. I think there is a reason for this–the fallacious scientism that engineers are steeped in, and which most unthinkingly accept. I do not think you understand economics, or how to argue properly for value-related propositions or norms without conflating it with causal-factual matters.

In fact, to be honest, I do not think you or Quinn are interested in truth at all. I could be wrong–but in this case, it just means you have very dull minds. I don’t think you do, so think it more likely that you don’t care about the truth and are just arguing li

]]> By: Dale B. Halling http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/10/02/sa-patent-attorney-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3875 Dale B. Halling Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:30:13 +0000 http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=3376#comment-3875 Dear Mr. Kinsella, I have provided civil comments. I have answered you objections with facts and reason. But, you always respond by name calling and vague accusations. It makes me wonder whether you are interested in the truth or just interested in winning a discussion. Dear Mr. Kinsella, I have provided civil comments. I have answered you objections with facts and reason. But, you always respond by name calling and vague accusations. It makes me wonder whether you are interested in the truth or just interested in winning a discussion.

]]> By: Stephan Kinsella http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/10/02/sa-patent-attorney-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3874 Stephan Kinsella Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:05:49 +0000 http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=3376#comment-3874 Halling: I am against the patent system, despite my financial interest to the contrary, <i>because</i> I'm objective. To the contrary: since you benefit financially from the patent system and are merely a shill for it (given the paucity of your arguments combined with your audacity of marching ahead, despite lack of intellectual ammunition), I think it's clear who is biased here. Halling: I am against the patent system, despite my financial interest to the contrary, because I’m objective.

To the contrary: since you benefit financially from the patent system and are merely a shill for it (given the paucity of your arguments combined with your audacity of marching ahead, despite lack of intellectual ammunition), I think it’s clear who is biased here.

]]> By: Dale B. Halling http://www.stephankinsella.com/2009/10/02/sa-patent-attorney-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3873 Dale B. Halling Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:02:25 +0000 http://www.stephankinsella.com/?p=3376#comment-3873 Dear Mr. Kinsella, I have already dispelled the low patent quality myth - see http://hallingblog.com/2009/08/18/patent-quality-myth/. Since you believe that there should not be a patent system at all, you opinion cannot be considered objective on this issue. Dear Mr. Kinsella, I have already dispelled the low patent quality myth – see http://hallingblog.com/2009/08/18/patent-quality-myth/.

Since you believe that there should not be a patent system at all, you opinion cannot be considered objective on this issue.

]]>