≡ Menu

Attention Libertarian Freeloaders

Update: This was just a rant when I was in a bad mood. In actuality I like helping people, especially friends and fellow libertarians. So take the following with a grain of salt. However I do wish more libertarians had better manners when the approach others for help. SK

***

I don’t mind giving free advice. Really. I do it a lot.

But libertarians sometimes are inept at social graces. They ask for help in a demanding, entitled way; they ask for legal advice without realizing that the attorney who does this is liable for malpractice even if he doesn’t get paid; they often are clueless about standard professional letter-writing standards. Typically I get an unsolicited email from a strange libertarian, something like this,

Hi Stephen,

See this link–it’s an interesting article about [xyz]–why does the author think [abc]?

[or: I am starting a business and need some advice. How can I tell if [xyz] is patentable? Do you think this is a good idea?]

Etc. etc. Note the many problems: mispelling my name; informally and inappropriately taking the liberty of calling my by my first name; failing to politely introduce yourself and to politely explain why you are writing and exactly what you want from me; giving me an out in case I do not have time; etc.

I mean, libertarians are often just hopeless in this regard. It’s one reason I sometimes despair about our movement, and moan “DOOMED” to myself. And it’s notorious to have libertarians who are moochers–some guy you met at a conference one time 7 years ago calls you out of the blue, “Hey, I’ll be in Houston for a few days, can I stay at your house?” I think there have been a couple of LP Presidential candidates who could not even campaign in some states because of outstanding arrest warrants … for failure to pay child support. The problem is our movement attracts a disproportionate share of losers and marginal types simply because they have less to lose from advocating our radical philosophy. Competent, smart, successful types have financial and other opportunities in the real world that tempt them to eschew marginalized radicalism. Just the way it is. Sad. What you gonna do?

I was reminded (remound?) of some of this, this morning, when I stumbled across the witty message by GTD expert Merlin Mann, who makes it clear here the of all the emails he gets, he has instructed his assistant to make sure he sees the ones from actual clients actually willing to pay him actual money (no doubt, as opposed to all the imposing freeloaders out there):

Hello, I’m Merlin Mann. That one guy from the internet. Hi. Thank you VERY much for your note and your time. These are valuable things.

I get so much great email every day. SO much. SO great. But, unfortunately, I do get way more of it than I could ever do anything responsible with—unless I got lots of help. Which I do.

Consequently, my ninja assistant, Erica, looks over all my messages-including the note you were kind enough to send just now-and, then she tells me what, if anything, I need to do about those messages.

She’s great like that. LOVE that Erica. Good people.

Work & Money: An Admission

Because I’m a selfish little homunculus of a man-happily charged with stewarding an exquisite young family as well as a career that’s increasingly difficult to either explain or manage-I have instructed Erica to dedicate an unaccountably large amount of her time to working on things that are related to my paying work as a writer, speaker, and freelance helper-of-people.

Thus, if you have written about trying to give me money in any form or fashion, please do not be squeamish about pointing this out to Erica in any subsequent correspondence; Erica and I have talked about this topic at length, and we both agree that money is very important with regard to work.

In fact, from what I can gather, “money” has, in practice, become SO heavily associated with “work” that many Americans would not actually “do” a given “job” were they not “paid” to “do so.” Just from what I can gather.

This is really charming and witty. I’m about to hire Merlin myself for a bit of inbox zero/GTD/43 folders consulting.

As for ineptness in communication, I also see this as editor of Libertarian Papers. I often get letters from authors who make all sorts of mistakes. For example, the often fail to make it clear that it’s a submission. I’ll get an email with a horribly misdescriptive subject line, such as “the fed,” with the body saying “Hi, I’m wondering if this would be suitable.” Or, “Hoping you find this of interest.” With a file attached. No mention of Libertarian Papers.  No “Dear Editor.” So I have to ask, “Is this a submission for publication in LP?” Another horrible mistake is pleading for their article’s importance. When this is done in the first email, it’s a bad sign. I can almost always predict the article will be crap. “Dear Sir: I’ve attached my paper, which I have worked on for 13 years. I believe it is an extremely important thesis that will lift the libertarian movement out of its doldrums and presage a world of liberty within 33 years!!” Even worse is when an author is rejected and then argues with me about this or demands a better justification for the rejection. When this happens, literally 100% of the time the author is a crank.

By the way, I stumbled across this delightfully practical article the other day (no offense, libertarians), How to Ask for a Reference Letter (h/t Gary Chartier), which provides excellent advice on professional, polite ways to word overtures to people when you ask them a favor. How to start the letter, how to give your target a way out of your intrusive requests, and so on.

Come on, libertarians, learn. Yes we can!

Share
{ 9 comments… add one }
  • Bob Roddis April 23, 2010, 12:15 pm

    Stephan:

    My favorite is being asked to drop everything on 15 hours’ notice to file a lawsuit seeking a court order directing a far away (from me) local PBS TV station to include the Libertarian Party candidate in the local PBS candidate debate, which, of course, will be watched intently by millions of people.

  • Anon April 24, 2010, 12:10 pm

    Mr. Kinsella,

    Hello I am a college student. I apologize for not giving out my name. I was taught not to do so on the web. Your points are all very valid and I agree with them all. At the same time, I’ve known many people who “hate” being called Mr. or Ms. and prefer being called by their first name. This makes matters very confusing for those of us who wish not to make other feel uncomfortable or “old.”

    I, myself, have made the mistake of referring to people by their first names many times in emails, when it was not appropriate to do so. That is why I thank you for bringing up this issue. Formal writing is a skill that may have been forgotten by many with emails taking over written letters as a primary form of correspondence. Cell phone texting no doubt has had a hand in this as well.

    I have also been to informal in my writing to others in emails recently, when I should have kept a formal tone as I am sure is the case with others. Thank you as well for the link about reference letters. It is very helpful.

    Take care,

    Anon

  • Paul Vahur April 25, 2010, 6:08 am

    Dear Anon,

    my advice is to always err on the side of courtesy in whatever you do. Once the person you are in communication with indicates that he wants to be less formal you can drop the title (being somewhat reluctant there does not hurt either).

    We, the true libertarians are all about respecting property. Using the proper title (Mr, Mrs, Prof, Dr) is a way of respecting other person’s property in personal (immaterial) space. You can enter that space when invited (“Call me Paul”), without invitation you are trespassing (in a sense of speech). Nothing good can come out of trespass. Always respect the property of others.

    • Anon April 25, 2010, 9:41 pm

      Thank you Mr. Vahur. Sorry for my previous comment Mr. Kinsella. I wish I read that article long ago. It’s very helpful and true. I don’t know why I gave excuses for being informal. It’s very important.

  • PirateRothbard April 27, 2010, 7:47 am

    “inappropriately taking the liberty of calling my by my first name”

    Dang that sucks, we can’t call you Stephan? But Mr. Kinsella is a lot of typing. Could I call you “Mr. K” like you’re my high school gym coach?

  • Brad Spangler December 15, 2010, 12:48 pm

    I recently asked you for a bit of advice and would like to apologize if I didn’t show proper manners. Your help and input are deeply appreciated.

    • Stephan Kinsella December 15, 2010, 1:14 pm

      Oh, I was just ranting! I am happy to help my friends, of course.

  • Travis December 15, 2010, 1:00 pm

    The problem is our movement attracts a disproportionate share of losers and marginal types simply because they have less to lose from advocating our radical philosophy. Competent, smart, successful types have financial and other opportunities in the real world that tempt them to eschew marginalized radicalism. Just the way it is. Sad. What you gonna do?

    This is too true.

  • StraightLibertarianGForLife December 15, 2010, 1:07 pm

    Yo cuz, thanks for the pimp ass blog, it makes me hype while I’m at the library filing my unemployment claims. Let me know if you know legal loopholes so I can get out of childsupport. Word!

    Straight Libertarian G For Life

Leave a Comment

Bad Behavior has blocked 2277 access attempts in the last 7 days.

© 2012-2018 StephanKinsella.com CC0 To the extent possible under law, Stephan Kinsella has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to material on this Site, unless indicated otherwise. In the event the CC0 license is unenforceable a  Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License is hereby granted.

-- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

%d bloggers like this: