<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com</link>
	<description>Austro-Anarchist Libertarian Legal Theory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reply to Feser on Block &#171; LewRockwell.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-2/#comment-24135</link>
		<dc:creator>Reply to Feser on Block &#171; LewRockwell.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-24135</guid>
		<description>[...] seen this many times. For example, see some of my posts on the nature of aggression here, such as Feser&#8217;s reply to one of my replies (which was deleted from the L&amp;P blog when I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seen this many times. For example, see some of my posts on the nature of aggression here, such as Feser&#8217;s reply to one of my replies (which was deleted from the L&amp;P blog when I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#34;Against Intellectual Property&#34;: Audiobook Version &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-2/#comment-21554</link>
		<dc:creator>&#34;Against Intellectual Property&#34;: Audiobook Version &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-21554</guid>
		<description>[...] audiobook of my monograph Against Intellectual Property (Mises Institute, 2008; Mises Store; PDF; Scribd; HTML) has been prepared. The narrator is Jock [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] audiobook of my monograph Against Intellectual Property (Mises Institute, 2008; Mises Store; PDF; Scribd; HTML) has been prepared. The narrator is Jock [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intellectual Property Hyperinflation &#171; IPso Jure</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-2/#comment-20852</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property Hyperinflation &#171; IPso Jure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-20852</guid>
		<description>[...] I have also learnt (via Google Alerts) of an audiobook edition of Stephan Kinsella’s monograph Against Intellectual Property (Mises Institute, 2008; Mises Store; PDF; Scribd; HTML). The book has a go at a number of sacred [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have also learnt (via Google Alerts) of an audiobook edition of Stephan Kinsella’s monograph Against Intellectual Property (Mises Institute, 2008; Mises Store; PDF; Scribd; HTML). The book has a go at a number of sacred [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Intellectual Monopoly: Yeager and Other Letters Re Liberty article &#34;Libertarianism and Intellectual Property&#34;</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-2/#comment-14150</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Intellectual Monopoly: Yeager and Other Letters Re Liberty article &#34;Libertarianism and Intellectual Property&#34;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-14150</guid>
		<description>[...] Monopoly My article &#8220;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism&#8221; was published in the December, 2009 issue of Liberty; the March 2010 issue features the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monopoly My article &#8220;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism&#8221; was published in the December, 2009 issue of Liberty; the March 2010 issue features the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Блог Павла Сурменка &#187; Австрийцы против копирайта</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-2/#comment-12114</link>
		<dc:creator>Блог Павла Сурменка &#187; Австрийцы против копирайта</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-12114</guid>
		<description>[...] Stephan в статье Against Intellectual Property раскрывал этот вопрос более полно, с позиций [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stephan в статье Against Intellectual Property раскрывал этот вопрос более полно, с позиций [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP and Economics: Intellectual Property and the Structure of Human Action</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-2/#comment-11906</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP and Economics: Intellectual Property and the Structure of Human Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-11906</guid>
		<description>[...] scarce things, thus supplanting already-existing rights in scarce resources. (See, e.g., my Against Intellectual Property, &#8220;The Case Against IP: A Concise Guide&#8221; and other material [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scarce things, thus supplanting already-existing rights in scarce resources. (See, e.g., my Against Intellectual Property, &#8220;The Case Against IP: A Concise Guide&#8221; and other material [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP as a Joke: IP: The Objectivists Strike Back!</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-2/#comment-10658</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP as a Joke: IP: The Objectivists Strike Back!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-10658</guid>
		<description>[...] the most ardent modern advocates of intellectual property (in addition to Andrew J. Galambos [see Against Intellectual Property], and perhaps J. Neil Schulman), but Rand in a sense built her entire philosophical edifice on IP: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the most ardent modern advocates of intellectual property (in addition to Andrew J. Galambos [see Against Intellectual Property], and perhaps J. Neil Schulman), but Rand in a sense built her entire philosophical edifice on IP: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against Intellectual Property in Italian &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-8852</link>
		<dc:creator>Against Intellectual Property in Italian &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-8852</guid>
		<description>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been translated into Italian by Mr. Robert Newson: Contro La Proprietà Intellettuale (.doc file). Translations into Spanish, Polish, Portugese and Georgian have been made as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been translated into Italian by Mr. Robert Newson: Contro La Proprietà Intellettuale (.doc file). Translations into Spanish, Polish, Portugese and Georgian have been made as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against Intellectual Property in Italian - Economics -</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-8848</link>
		<dc:creator>Against Intellectual Property in Italian - Economics -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-8848</guid>
		<description>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been translated into Italian by Mr. Robert Newson: Contro La Proprietà Intellettuale (.doc file). Translations into Spanish, Polish, Portugese and Georgian have been made as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been translated into Italian by Mr. Robert Newson: Contro La Proprietà Intellettuale (.doc file). Translations into Spanish, Polish, Portugese and Georgian have been made as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against Intellectual Property in Italian</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-8824</link>
		<dc:creator>Against Intellectual Property in Italian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-8824</guid>
		<description>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been translated into Italian by Mr. Robert Newson: Contro La Proprietà Intellettuale (.doc file). Translations into Spanish, Polish, Portugese and Georgian have been made as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been translated into Italian by Mr. Robert Newson: Contro La Proprietà Intellettuale (.doc file). Translations into Spanish, Polish, Portugese and Georgian have been made as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objectivists: &#8220;All Property is Intellectual Property&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-8205</link>
		<dc:creator>Objectivists: &#8220;All Property is Intellectual Property&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-8205</guid>
		<description>[...] to such a height that they totally trump real rights. This is no exaggeration. As I noted in Against Intellectual Property, Rand actually, incredibly said that “patents are the heart and core of property rights.” See [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to such a height that they totally trump real rights. This is no exaggeration. As I noted in Against Intellectual Property, Rand actually, incredibly said that “patents are the heart and core of property rights.” See [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP and Economics: IP and Artificial Scarcity</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-7401</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP and Economics: IP and Artificial Scarcity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-7401</guid>
		<description>[...] scarcity&#8221; insight is indeed a good one, but it is not mine. From pp. 33-34 of Against Intellectual Property: Ideas are not naturally scarce. However, by recognizing a right in an ideal object, one creates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scarcity&#8221; insight is indeed a good one, but it is not mine. From pp. 33-34 of Against Intellectual Property: Ideas are not naturally scarce. However, by recognizing a right in an ideal object, one creates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP and Artificial Scarcity - Economics -</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-7388</link>
		<dc:creator>IP and Artificial Scarcity - Economics -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-7388</guid>
		<description>[...] So I thought I would elaborate a bit on this. The &quot;artificial scarcity&quot; insight is indeed a good one, but it is not mine. From pp. 33-34 of Against Intellectual Property: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So I thought I would elaborate a bit on this. The &quot;artificial scarcity&quot; insight is indeed a good one, but it is not mine. From pp. 33-34 of Against Intellectual Property: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP and Artificial Scarcity</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-7385</link>
		<dc:creator>IP and Artificial Scarcity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-7385</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;artifiical scarity&#8221; insight is indeed a good one, but it is not mine. From p. 34 of Against Intellectual Property: Bouckaert also argues that natural scarcity is what gives rise to the need for property rules, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;artifiical scarity&#8221; insight is indeed a good one, but it is not mine. From p. 34 of Against Intellectual Property: Bouckaert also argues that natural scarcity is what gives rise to the need for property rules, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is IP Property: Rand on IP, Owning &#34;Values&#34;, and &#34;Rearrangement Rights&#34;</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-6425</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is IP Property: Rand on IP, Owning &#34;Values&#34;, and &#34;Rearrangement Rights&#34;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-6425</guid>
		<description>[...] to such a height that they totally trump real rights. This is no exaggeration. As I noted in Against Intellectual Property, Rand actually, incredibly said that &#8220;patents are the heart and core of property [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to such a height that they totally trump real rights. This is no exaggeration. As I noted in Against Intellectual Property, Rand actually, incredibly said that &#8220;patents are the heart and core of property [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand on IP, Owning &#34;Values&#34;, and &#34;Rearrangement Rights&#34; - Economics -</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-6418</link>
		<dc:creator>Rand on IP, Owning &#34;Values&#34;, and &#34;Rearrangement Rights&#34; - Economics -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-6418</guid>
		<description>[...] to such a height that they totally trump real rights. This is no exaggeration. As I noted in Against Intellectual Property, Rand actually, incredibly said that &quot;patents are the heart and core of property rights.&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to such a height that they totally trump real rights. This is no exaggeration. As I noted in Against Intellectual Property, Rand actually, incredibly said that &quot;patents are the heart and core of property rights.&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand on IP, Owning &#8220;Values&#8221;, and &#8220;Rearrangement Rights&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-6417</link>
		<dc:creator>Rand on IP, Owning &#8220;Values&#8221;, and &#8220;Rearrangement Rights&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-6417</guid>
		<description>[...] to such a height that they totally trump real rights. This is no exaggeration. As I noted in Against Intellectual Property, Rand actually, incredibly said that &#8220;patents are the heart and core of property [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to such a height that they totally trump real rights. This is no exaggeration. As I noted in Against Intellectual Property, Rand actually, incredibly said that &#8220;patents are the heart and core of property [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Libertarian Perspectives: &#34;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism,&#34; Liberty magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-6195</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Libertarian Perspectives: &#34;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism,&#34; Liberty magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-6195</guid>
		<description>[...] is based in part on a speech at Mises University 2009 (July 30, 2009; audio; video) and also on my What Libertarianism Is, which contains references not present in the Liberty paper (as does The Case Against IP: A Concise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is based in part on a speech at Mises University 2009 (July 30, 2009; audio; video) and also on my What Libertarianism Is, which contains references not present in the Liberty paper (as does The Case Against IP: A Concise [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#34;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism,&#34; Liberty magazine &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-6169</link>
		<dc:creator>&#34;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism,&#34; Liberty magazine &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-6169</guid>
		<description>[...] is based in part on a speech at Mises University 2009 (July 30, 2009; audio; video) and also on my What Libertarianism Is, which contains references not present in the Liberty paper (as does The Case Against IP: A Concise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is based in part on a speech at Mises University 2009 (July 30, 2009; audio; video) and also on my What Libertarianism Is, which contains references not present in the Liberty paper (as does The Case Against IP: A Concise [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism,&#8221; Liberty magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-6163</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism,&#8221; Liberty magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-6163</guid>
		<description>[...] article &#8220;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism&#8221; [PDF] was published last month in Liberty magazine (December 2009 issue). This article is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article &#8220;Intellectual Property and Libertarianism&#8221; [PDF] was published last month in Liberty magazine (December 2009 issue). This article is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Machan on Rand and Objectivism</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-6077</link>
		<dc:creator>Machan on Rand and Objectivism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-6077</guid>
		<description>[...] My friend Tibor Machan presents a fascinating and excellent lecture on &#8220;Thoughts on Objectivism and Ayn Rand&#8221; at the Libertarian Alliance Conference in October 2009 in London. (He is introduced by my friend Sean Gabb; Gabb&#8217;s video record of the proceedings of the conference. Gabb, a regular at Hans-Hermann Hoppe&#8217;s Property and Freedom Society meetings (see his The Third Meeting of the Property and Freedom Society, Bodrum, May 2008: A Brief Record; The Second Meeting of the Property and Freedom Society; The Inaugural Meeting of the Property and Freedom Society: An Incidental Record), also contributed the chapter &#8220;Hans-Hermann Hoppe and the Political Equivalent of Nuclear Fusion&#8221; to Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My friend Tibor Machan presents a fascinating and excellent lecture on &#8220;Thoughts on Objectivism and Ayn Rand&#8221; at the Libertarian Alliance Conference in October 2009 in London. (He is introduced by my friend Sean Gabb; Gabb&#8217;s video record of the proceedings of the conference. Gabb, a regular at Hans-Hermann Hoppe&#8217;s Property and Freedom Society meetings (see his The Third Meeting of the Property and Freedom Society, Bodrum, May 2008: A Brief Record; The Second Meeting of the Property and Freedom Society; The Inaugural Meeting of the Property and Freedom Society: An Incidental Record), also contributed the chapter &#8220;Hans-Hermann Hoppe and the Political Equivalent of Nuclear Fusion&#8221; to Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nokia&#8217;s infringement suit against Apple illustrates need to scrap US patent system</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-5724</link>
		<dc:creator>Nokia&#8217;s infringement suit against Apple illustrates need to scrap US patent system</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-5724</guid>
		<description>[...] further elaboration of the ideas expressed in this post, see my monograph Against Intellectual Property, my article &#8220;The Case Against IP: A Concise Guide,&#8221; and other material on my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] further elaboration of the ideas expressed in this post, see my monograph Against Intellectual Property, my article &#8220;The Case Against IP: A Concise Guide,&#8221; and other material on my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Better than the Nolan Chart</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-4975</link>
		<dc:creator>Better than the Nolan Chart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-4975</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Classical Liberalism versus Anarchocapitalism&#8221; (originally published in Property, Freedom and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2009)), Jesus Huerta de Soto provides an excellent chart that I think is superior to the Nolan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Classical Liberalism versus Anarchocapitalism&#8221; (originally published in Property, Freedom and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2009)), Jesus Huerta de Soto provides an excellent chart that I think is superior to the Nolan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP and Economics: Against Monopoly</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-4902</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP and Economics: Against Monopoly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-4902</guid>
		<description>[...] and Externalities,&#8221; by Hardy Bouillon, Mises Daily (Oct. 27, 2009), originally published in Property, Freedom and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Externalities,&#8221; by Hardy Bouillon, Mises Daily (Oct. 27, 2009), originally published in Property, Freedom and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;A Note on Intellectual Property and Externalities,&#8221; by Hardy Bouillon</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-4876</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;A Note on Intellectual Property and Externalities,&#8221; by Hardy Bouillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-4876</guid>
		<description>[...] and Externalities,&#8221; by Hardy Bouillon, Mises Daily (Oct. 27, 2009), originally published in Property, Freedom and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Externalities,&#8221; by Hardy Bouillon, Mises Daily (Oct. 27, 2009), originally published in Property, Freedom and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pilon on Corporations: A Discussion with Kevin Carson</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-4824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pilon on Corporations: A Discussion with Kevin Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-4824</guid>
		<description>[...] They are responsible if they are proximate causes. A and B can both be 100% responsible [see my Causation and Aggression]. This shows that the whole pie analogy is ridiculous. In the corporate context, B is liable. If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They are responsible if they are proximate causes. A and B can both be 100% responsible [see my Causation and Aggression]. This shows that the whole pie analogy is ridiculous. In the corporate context, B is liable. If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thick and Thin Libertarians on IP and Open Source &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-4584</link>
		<dc:creator>Thick and Thin Libertarians on IP and Open Source &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-4584</guid>
		<description>[...] open source/free software/anti-IP are compatible with libertarianism. Yes, this is true, as I have argued extensively. But this is a strange argument coming from Lee, who himself is not opposed to IP in any principled [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] open source/free software/anti-IP are compatible with libertarianism. Yes, this is true, as I have argued extensively. But this is a strange argument coming from Lee, who himself is not opposed to IP in any principled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thick and Thin Libertarians on IP and Open Source</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-4579</link>
		<dc:creator>Thick and Thin Libertarians on IP and Open Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-4579</guid>
		<description>[...] open source/free software/anti-IP are compatible with libertarianism. Yes, this is true, as I have argued extensively. But this is a strange argument coming from Lee, who himself is not opposed to IP in any principled [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] open source/free software/anti-IP are compatible with libertarianism. Yes, this is true, as I have argued extensively. But this is a strange argument coming from Lee, who himself is not opposed to IP in any principled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Intellectual Property: High School Senior&#8217;s Questions about IP</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-4135</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Intellectual Property: High School Senior&#8217;s Questions about IP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-4135</guid>
		<description>[...] Napster and Against the Second Homesteading Rule and Against Intellectual Property (both available here), humans need to use scarce or &#8220;rivalrous&#8221; resources &#8212; for example, tangible [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Napster and Against the Second Homesteading Rule and Against Intellectual Property (both available here), humans need to use scarce or &#8220;rivalrous&#8221; resources &#8212; for example, tangible [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High School Senior&#8217;s Questions about IP</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-4119</link>
		<dc:creator>High School Senior&#8217;s Questions about IP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-4119</guid>
		<description>[...] Napster and Against the Second Homesteading Rule and Against Intellectual Property (both available here), humans need to use scarce or &#8220;rivalrous&#8221; resources &#8212; for example, tangible [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Napster and Against the Second Homesteading Rule and Against Intellectual Property (both available here), humans need to use scarce or &#8220;rivalrous&#8221; resources &#8212; for example, tangible [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Das Internet braucht keine Regulierung, Kultur braucht keinen Staat, Geistiges Eigentum existiert nicht &#124; ars libertatis</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-3930</link>
		<dc:creator>Das Internet braucht keine Regulierung, Kultur braucht keinen Staat, Geistiges Eigentum existiert nicht &#124; ars libertatis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-3930</guid>
		<description>[...] Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine &#8211; Against Intellectual Monopoly Stephan Kinsella &#8211; Against Intellectual Property Stephan Kinsella &#8211; The Case Against IP: A Concise Guide &#8230;dann geh&#246;rt der [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine &#8211; Against Intellectual Monopoly Stephan Kinsella &#8211; Against Intellectual Property Stephan Kinsella &#8211; The Case Against IP: A Concise Guide &#8230;dann geh&#246;rt der [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against Intellectual Property in Portugese &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-3820</link>
		<dc:creator>Against Intellectual Property in Portugese &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-3820</guid>
		<description>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been been translated into Portugese (Contra a Propriedade Intelectual) by Rafael Hotz, of the Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil. It was previously translated into Spanish, Polish, and Georgian. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been been translated into Portugese (Contra a Propriedade Intelectual) by Rafael Hotz, of the Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil. It was previously translated into Spanish, Polish, and Georgian. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is IP Property: Against Intellectual Property in Portugese</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is IP Property: Against Intellectual Property in Portugese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-3801</guid>
		<description>[...] Monopoly Against Intellectual Property has been been translated into Portugese (Contra a Propriedade Intelectual) by Rafael Hotz, of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monopoly Against Intellectual Property has been been translated into Portugese (Contra a Propriedade Intelectual) by Rafael Hotz, of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against Intellectual Property in Portugese</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-3777</link>
		<dc:creator>Against Intellectual Property in Portugese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-3777</guid>
		<description>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been been translated into Portugese (Contra a Propriedade Intelectual) by Rafael Hotz, of the Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil.  It was previously translated into Spanish, Polish, and Georgian. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Against Intellectual Property has been been translated into Portugese (Contra a Propriedade Intelectual) by Rafael Hotz, of the Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil.  It was previously translated into Spanish, Polish, and Georgian. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Lawyers Who Don&#8217;t Toe the Line Should Be Punished! &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-3744</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Lawyers Who Don&#8217;t Toe the Line Should Be Punished! &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-3744</guid>
		<description>[...] e.g., my The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property: A Concise Guide; and other libertarian IP publications. If anything, my experience in the patent field shows me how much waste there is. It shows me what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e.g., my The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property: A Concise Guide; and other libertarian IP publications. If anything, my experience in the patent field shows me how much waste there is. It shows me what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Lawyers Who Don&#8217;t Toe the Line Should Be Punished!</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-3724</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Lawyers Who Don&#8217;t Toe the Line Should Be Punished!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-3724</guid>
		<description>[...] e.g., my The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property: A Concise Guide; and other libertarian IP publications. If anything, my experience in the patent field shows me how much waste there is. It shows me what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e.g., my The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property: A Concise Guide; and other libertarian IP publications. If anything, my experience in the patent field shows me how much waste there is. It shows me what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Morality of Acquiring and Enforcing Patents &#171; LewRockwell.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-3682</link>
		<dc:creator>The Morality of Acquiring and Enforcing Patents &#171; LewRockwell.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-3682</guid>
		<description>[...] one of the few registered patent attorneys who oppose patents &#8211;and on principled, pro-private property, grounds, not for utilitarian or anti-industrialist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one of the few registered patent attorneys who oppose patents &#8211;and on principled, pro-private property, grounds, not for utilitarian or anti-industrialist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoppe&#8217;s Review of Rothbard&#8217;s Festschrift</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoppe&#8217;s Review of Rothbard&#8217;s Festschrift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>[...] Hans-Hermann Hoppe, himself the recent recipient of his own festschrift, Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (Jörg Guido Hülsmann &amp; Stephan Kinsella, eds., Mises Institute, 2009), was a contributor to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hans-Hermann Hoppe, himself the recent recipient of his own festschrift, Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (Jörg Guido Hülsmann &amp; Stephan Kinsella, eds., Mises Institute, 2009), was a contributor to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE: Those Pesky “Voluntary” Taxes: Natural versus Positive Law &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>RE: Those Pesky “Voluntary” Taxes: Natural versus Positive Law &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>[...] services or to evade income tax&#8211;but it should not be. Just law&#8211;law compatible with libertarian principles&#8211;is what positive law should be. Libertarian law, just law, is like a template or ideal by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] services or to evade income tax&#8211;but it should not be. Just law&#8211;law compatible with libertarian principles&#8211;is what positive law should be. Libertarian law, just law, is like a template or ideal by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natural, Positive Law, Tax Evasion, Rituals and Incantations &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-2847</link>
		<dc:creator>Natural, Positive Law, Tax Evasion, Rituals and Incantations &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-2847</guid>
		<description>[...] services or to evade income tax&#8211;but it should not be. Just law&#8211;law compatible with libertarian principles&#8211;is what positive law should be. Libertarian law, just law, is like a template or ideal by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] services or to evade income tax&#8211;but it should not be. Just law&#8211;law compatible with libertarian principles&#8211;is what positive law should be. Libertarian law, just law, is like a template or ideal by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natural, Positive Law, Tax Evasion, Rituals and Incantations</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-2826</link>
		<dc:creator>Natural, Positive Law, Tax Evasion, Rituals and Incantations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-2826</guid>
		<description>[...] services or to evade income tax&#8211;but it should not be. Just law&#8211;law compatible with libertarian principles&#8211;is what positive law should be. Libertarian law, just law, is like a template or ideal by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] services or to evade income tax&#8211;but it should not be. Just law&#8211;law compatible with libertarian principles&#8211;is what positive law should be. Libertarian law, just law, is like a template or ideal by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE: Those Pesky “Voluntary” Taxes: Natural versus Positive Law &#171; LewRockwell.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-2825</link>
		<dc:creator>RE: Those Pesky “Voluntary” Taxes: Natural versus Positive Law &#171; LewRockwell.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-2825</guid>
		<description>[...] services or to evade income tax&#8211;but it should not be. Just law&#8211;law compatible with libertarian principles&#8211;is what positive law should be. Libertarian law, just law, is like a template or ideal by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] services or to evade income tax&#8211;but it should not be. Just law&#8211;law compatible with libertarian principles&#8211;is what positive law should be. Libertarian law, just law, is like a template or ideal by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intellectual Property and Libertarianism (Video)</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-2541</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property and Libertarianism (Video)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-2541</guid>
		<description>[...] of the libertarian framework was distilled from a more elaborated version, contained my chapter What Libertarianism Is, which appeared in the Hoppe Festschrift, Property, Freedom and Society. An article based on my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the libertarian framework was distilled from a more elaborated version, contained my chapter What Libertarianism Is, which appeared in the Hoppe Festschrift, Property, Freedom and Society. An article based on my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property: A Concise Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property: A Concise Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>[...] justified; see my What It Means To Be an Anarcho-Capitalist.) And so, in 1995 I started publishing articles pointing out problems with IP, finally culminating in my lengthy 2001 Journal of Libertarian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] justified; see my What It Means To Be an Anarcho-Capitalist.) And so, in 1995 I started publishing articles pointing out problems with IP, finally culminating in my lengthy 2001 Journal of Libertarian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment on David Koepsell&#8217;s &#8220;Why I Believe Gene Patenting is Wrong&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment on David Koepsell&#8217;s &#8220;Why I Believe Gene Patenting is Wrong&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>[...] unnatural and artificial privileges granted by the state at the expense of real property rights. My website contains various articles, books, and speeches on this topic, including Against Intellectual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unnatural and artificial privileges granted by the state at the expense of real property rights. My website contains various articles, books, and speeches on this topic, including Against Intellectual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Libertarianism Is &#171; Informed Citizens</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>What Libertarianism Is &#171; Informed Citizens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>[...] Journal of Libertarian Studies 17, no. 2 (Spring 2003): n. 32 and accompanying text; idem, Against Intellectual Property (Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008), pp. 30–31, 49; also Randy E. Barnett, &#8220;A [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Journal of Libertarian Studies 17, no. 2 (Spring 2003): n. 32 and accompanying text; idem, Against Intellectual Property (Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008), pp. 30–31, 49; also Randy E. Barnett, &#8220;A [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galambosian IP Recursion</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>Galambosian IP Recursion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>[...] noted before this nutty purported idea of hyper-IPer Andrew Galambos (see Galambos and Other Nuts; Against Intellectual Property, p. 27): Galambos took his own ideas to ridiculous lengths dropping a nickel in a fund box every [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noted before this nutty purported idea of hyper-IPer Andrew Galambos (see Galambos and Other Nuts; Against Intellectual Property, p. 27): Galambos took his own ideas to ridiculous lengths dropping a nickel in a fund box every [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Irrelevance of the Impossibility of Anarcho-Libertarianism - Economics -</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>The Irrelevance of the Impossibility of Anarcho-Libertarianism - Economics -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>[...] states by their nature commit aggression--and as we are libertarians and against aggression (see my What Libertarianism Is), we are thus against [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] states by their nature commit aggression&#8211;and as we are libertarians and against aggression (see my What Libertarianism Is), we are thus against [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Irrelevance of the Impossibility of Anarcho-Libertarianism</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>The Irrelevance of the Impossibility of Anarcho-Libertarianism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>[...] nature commit aggression&#8211;and as we are libertarians and against aggression (see my &#8220;What Libertarianism Is&#8220;), we are thus against [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nature commit aggression&#8211;and as we are libertarians and against aggression (see my &#8220;What Libertarianism Is&#8220;), we are thus against [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spanish Translations of Libertarian Articles by the Heroic Jorge Valin</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Spanish Translations of Libertarian Articles by the Heroic Jorge Valin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>[...] Publications [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Publications [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prove that would have been invented without patents!</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Prove that would have been invented without patents!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-440</guid>
		<description>[...] ever, without a patent system? After all, a patent system undeniably has costs in terms of both rights and money. How can it be shown that having invention X is worth the violation of rights incurred as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ever, without a patent system? After all, a patent system undeniably has costs in terms of both rights and money. How can it be shown that having invention X is worth the violation of rights incurred as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prove that would have been invented without patents! &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Prove that would have been invented without patents! &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-426</guid>
		<description>[...] ever, without a patent system? After all, a patent system undeniably has costs in terms of both rights and money. How can it be shown that having invention X is worth the violation of rights incurred as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ever, without a patent system? After all, a patent system undeniably has costs in terms of both rights and money. How can it be shown that having invention X is worth the violation of rights incurred as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet Another Study Finds Patents Do Not Encourage Innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet Another Study Finds Patents Do Not Encourage Innovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-297</guid>
		<description>[...] IP views know, I&#8217;m not a utilitarian (see my There&#8217;s No Such Thing As A Free Patent; Against Intellectual Property); but almost all IP proponents are, and claim that IP is &#8220;worth it&#8221; because it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IP views know, I&#8217;m not a utilitarian (see my There&#8217;s No Such Thing As A Free Patent; Against Intellectual Property); but almost all IP proponents are, and claim that IP is &#8220;worth it&#8221; because it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On J. Neil Schulman&#8217;s Logorights</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>On J. Neil Schulman&#8217;s Logorights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-296</guid>
		<description>[...] Metaphors, and Lockean Homesteading; Renaming Intellectual Property; and pp. 16, 26 et pass. of my Against Intellectual Property]: Neil, I said your term “logorights” is somewhat arcane, not your theory, and there was no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Metaphors, and Lockean Homesteading; Renaming Intellectual Property; and pp. 16, 26 et pass. of my Against Intellectual Property]: Neil, I said your term “logorights” is somewhat arcane, not your theory, and there was no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet Another Study Finds Patents Do Not Encourage Innovation &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet Another Study Finds Patents Do Not Encourage Innovation &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-286</guid>
		<description>[...] IP views know, I&#8217;m not a utilitarian (see my There&#8217;s No Such Thing As A Free Patent; Against Intellectual Property); but almost all IP proponents are, and claim that IP is &#8220;worth it&#8221; because it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IP views know, I&#8217;m not a utilitarian (see my There&#8217;s No Such Thing As A Free Patent; Against Intellectual Property); but almost all IP proponents are, and claim that IP is &#8220;worth it&#8221; because it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reply to Cathy Young&#8217;s &#8220;Copyright and creative freedom&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Reply to Cathy Young&#8217;s &#8220;Copyright and creative freedom&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-274</guid>
		<description>[...] It’s not an assumption; it’s a conclusion of years of study of and reflection on this matter as a libertarian and IP attorney, and taking the time to set forth a careful case for it in writing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It’s not an assumption; it’s a conclusion of years of study of and reflection on this matter as a libertarian and IP attorney, and taking the time to set forth a careful case for it in writing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Libertarian Case for Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>The Libertarian Case for Gay Marriage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=514#comment-169</guid>
		<description>[...] and natural law type arguments slowly shifted to a more realistic and focused transcendental type approach. On intellectual property, despite my initial&#8211;but hesitant and troubled&#8211;assumption that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and natural law type arguments slowly shifted to a more realistic and focused transcendental type approach. On intellectual property, despite my initial&#8211;but hesitant and troubled&#8211;assumption that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
