<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third Party Documents and Texts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com</link>
	<description>Austro-Anarchist Libertarian Legal Theory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Legislaci&#243;n y ley en una sociedad libre - Mises Daily en español</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-21716</link>
		<dc:creator>Legislaci&#243;n y ley en una sociedad libre - Mises Daily en español</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-21716</guid>
		<description>[...] Este art&#237;culo se p&#250;blico por primera vez como &#8220;Legislation and Law in a Free Society&#8221;, The Freeman 45:9 (Septiembre de 1995), pp. 561&#8211;563 y se adapt&#243; de &#8220;Legislation and the Discovery of Law in a Free Society&#8221;, Journal of Libertarian Studies 11:2 (Verano de 1995), pp. 132&#8211;181, que contiene referencias detalladas. Muchas ed las obras citadas en este &#250;ltimo art&#237;culo ahora est&#225;n en l&#237;nea, algunas aqu&#237;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Este art&iacute;culo se p&uacute;blico por primera vez como &ldquo;Legislation and Law in a Free Society&rdquo;, The Freeman 45:9 (Septiembre de 1995), pp. 561&ndash;563 y se adapt&oacute; de &ldquo;Legislation and the Discovery of Law in a Free Society&rdquo;, Journal of Libertarian Studies 11:2 (Verano de 1995), pp. 132&ndash;181, que contiene referencias detalladas. Muchas ed las obras citadas en este &uacute;ltimo art&iacute;culo ahora est&aacute;n en l&iacute;nea, algunas aqu&iacute;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Re: Everything you need to know about Judge Alito &#8212; Or, Good and Bad Judicial Activism &#171; LewRockwell.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-13829</link>
		<dc:creator>Re: Everything you need to know about Judge Alito &#8212; Or, Good and Bad Judicial Activism &#171; LewRockwell.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-13829</guid>
		<description>[...] More Fourteenth Amendment and Federalism resources [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More Fourteenth Amendment and Federalism resources [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Basic Physics Reminder for Solar Energy Morons</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-4892</link>
		<dc:creator>A Basic Physics Reminder for Solar Energy Morons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-4892</guid>
		<description>[...] Solar energy is too dilute to ever be the main energy source, even if we got 100% efficient solar cells. See Beckmann, Petr, Why “Soft” Technology Will Not Be America’s Energy Salvation; other material by Beckmann here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Solar energy is too dilute to ever be the main energy source, even if we got 100% efficient solar cells. See Beckmann, Petr, Why “Soft” Technology Will Not Be America’s Energy Salvation; other material by Beckmann here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Problem with Legislation: James Carter v. the Field Codes &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-4231</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Problem with Legislation: James Carter v. the Field Codes &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-4231</guid>
		<description>[...] efforts, see my Legislation and the Discovery of Law in a Free Society; and the articles collected here; also my posts Book Recommendations: Private, International, and Common Law; Legal Theory and The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] efforts, see my Legislation and the Discovery of Law in a Free Society; and the articles collected here; also my posts Book Recommendations: Private, International, and Common Law; Legal Theory and The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Problem with Legislation: James Carter v. the Field Codes</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-4206</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Problem with Legislation: James Carter v. the Field Codes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-4206</guid>
		<description>[...] efforts, see my Legislation and the Discovery of Law in a Free Society; and the articles collected here; also my posts Book Recommendations: Private, International, and Common Law; Legal Theory and The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] efforts, see my Legislation and the Discovery of Law in a Free Society; and the articles collected here; also my posts Book Recommendations: Private, International, and Common Law; Legal Theory and The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On &#8220;States&#8217; Rights&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>On &#8220;States&#8217; Rights&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>[...] one of limited and enumerated powers (and it was meant to be: for more on this see the writing of Tom McAffee), and the background fact that the states were standard governments of plenary legislative and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one of limited and enumerated powers (and it was meant to be: for more on this see the writing of Tom McAffee), and the background fact that the states were standard governments of plenary legislative and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prychitko on Habermas and Austrianism: Where&#8217;s Hoppe? &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>Prychitko on Habermas and Austrianism: Where&#8217;s Hoppe? &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>[...] The paper is &#8220;Communicative action and the radical constitution: the Habermasian challenge to Hayek, Mises and their descendents.&#8221; Since this paper is by an Austrian, and grapples with Habermas&#8217;s communicative action ideas and its relation to Austrian praxeology, one would have thought it would least cite, if only to criticize, a fellow Austrian economist, who obtained his PhD under Habermas, and who has written a great deal on Habermas&#8217;s communicative action theories from a praxeological point of view&#8211;namely Hans-Hermann Hoppe. (See Hoppe: Habermas&#8217;s Anarcho-Conservative Student; Revisiting Argumentation Ethics; Discourse Ethics entry in Wikipedia (which yours truly started, and which has more on Hoppe and Habermas); Hoppe&#8217;s Argumentation Ethics writings; my New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory; and my collection of Habermas-related material here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The paper is &#8220;Communicative action and the radical constitution: the Habermasian challenge to Hayek, Mises and their descendents.&#8221; Since this paper is by an Austrian, and grapples with Habermas&#8217;s communicative action ideas and its relation to Austrian praxeology, one would have thought it would least cite, if only to criticize, a fellow Austrian economist, who obtained his PhD under Habermas, and who has written a great deal on Habermas&#8217;s communicative action theories from a praxeological point of view&#8211;namely Hans-Hermann Hoppe. (See Hoppe: Habermas&#8217;s Anarcho-Conservative Student; Revisiting Argumentation Ethics; Discourse Ethics entry in Wikipedia (which yours truly started, and which has more on Hoppe and Habermas); Hoppe&#8217;s Argumentation Ethics writings; my New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory; and my collection of Habermas-related material here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prychitko on Habermas and Austrianism: Where&#8217;s Hoppe? &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-3476</link>
		<dc:creator>Prychitko on Habermas and Austrianism: Where&#8217;s Hoppe? &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-3476</guid>
		<description>[...] The paper is &#8220;Communicative action and the radical constitution: the Habermasian challenge to Hayek, Mises and their descendents.&#8221; Since this paper is by an Austrian, and grapples with Habermas&#8217;s communicative action ideas and its relation to Austrian praxeology, one would have thought it would least cite, if only to criticize, a fellow Austrian economist, who obtained his PhD under Habermas, and who has written a great deal on Habermas&#8217;s communicative action theories from a praxeological point of view&#8211;namely Hans-Hermann Hoppe. (See Hoppe: Habermas&#8217;s Anarcho-Conservative Student; Revisiting Argumentation Ethics; Discourse Ethics entry in Wikipedia (which yours truly started, and which has more on Hoppe and Habermas); Hoppe&#8217;s Argumentation Ethics writings; my New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory; and my collection of Habermas-related material here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The paper is &#8220;Communicative action and the radical constitution: the Habermasian challenge to Hayek, Mises and their descendents.&#8221; Since this paper is by an Austrian, and grapples with Habermas&#8217;s communicative action ideas and its relation to Austrian praxeology, one would have thought it would least cite, if only to criticize, a fellow Austrian economist, who obtained his PhD under Habermas, and who has written a great deal on Habermas&#8217;s communicative action theories from a praxeological point of view&#8211;namely Hans-Hermann Hoppe. (See Hoppe: Habermas&#8217;s Anarcho-Conservative Student; Revisiting Argumentation Ethics; Discourse Ethics entry in Wikipedia (which yours truly started, and which has more on Hoppe and Habermas); Hoppe&#8217;s Argumentation Ethics writings; my New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory; and my collection of Habermas-related material here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prychitko on Habermas and Austrianism: Where&#8217;s Hoppe?</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-3444</link>
		<dc:creator>Prychitko on Habermas and Austrianism: Where&#8217;s Hoppe?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-3444</guid>
		<description>[...] The paper is &#8220;Communicative action and the radical constitution: the Habermasian challenge to Hayek, Mises and their descendents.&#8221; Since this paper is by an Austrian, and grapples with Habermas&#8217;s communicative action ideas and its relation to Austrian praxeology, one would have thought it would least cite, if only to criticize, a fellow Austrian economist, who obtained his PhD under Habermas, and who has written a great deal on Habermas&#8217;s communicative action theories from a praxeological point of view&#8211;namely Hans-Hermann Hoppe. (See Hoppe: Habermas’s Anarcho-Conservative Student; Revisiting Argumentation Ethics; Discourse Ethics entry in Wikipedia (which yours truly started, and which has more on Hoppe and Habermas); Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics writings; my New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory; and my collection of Habermas-related material here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The paper is &#8220;Communicative action and the radical constitution: the Habermasian challenge to Hayek, Mises and their descendents.&#8221; Since this paper is by an Austrian, and grapples with Habermas&#8217;s communicative action ideas and its relation to Austrian praxeology, one would have thought it would least cite, if only to criticize, a fellow Austrian economist, who obtained his PhD under Habermas, and who has written a great deal on Habermas&#8217;s communicative action theories from a praxeological point of view&#8211;namely Hans-Hermann Hoppe. (See Hoppe: Habermas’s Anarcho-Conservative Student; Revisiting Argumentation Ethics; Discourse Ethics entry in Wikipedia (which yours truly started, and which has more on Hoppe and Habermas); Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics writings; my New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory; and my collection of Habermas-related material here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Recommendations: Private, International, and Common Law; Legal Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.stephankinsella.com/texts/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Recommendations: Private, International, and Common Law; Legal Theory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephankinsella.com/wordpress/?page_id=523#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] Trakman, Leon E., The Law Merchant: The Evolution of Commercial Law [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trakman, Leon E., The Law Merchant: The Evolution of Commercial Law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
