“Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide” (2011) and Supplemental Resources

My article “Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide” was published in Mises Daily (May 27, 2011) (it includes “Discourse Ethics and Liberty: A Skeletal Ebook” [archived comments on Mises thread]). Below I note some relevant supplemental material that has been published since or that I have been made aware of that was not noted in the original article, and a few pieces with missing links from the original. It was also discussed on the Mises blog when published (archived comments)

• Hans Hermann Hoppe, “On The Ethics of Argumentation” (PFS 2016)
• The A priori of Argumention, video introduction by Hoppe
• Lecture 3 of my 2011 Mises Academy course, “The Social Theory of Hoppe” (slides here)
• Lecture 2 of my 2011 Mises Academy course, “Libertarian Legal Theory: Property, Conflict, and Society” (slides here)
• my “Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights,” in The Dialectics of Liberty (Lexington Books, 2019)
• Kinsella, The Genesis of Estoppel: My Libertarian Rights Theory, StephanKinsella.com (March 22, 2016)
• ————, Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics and Its Critics, StephanKinsella.com (Aug. 11, 2015)
• Roger Pilon, “A Theory of Rights: Toward Limited Government“
• Alan Gewirth, “The Basis and Content of Human Rights“
• Pilon, “Ordering Rights Consistently: Or, What We Do and Do Not Have Rights To“
• Michaël Bauwens, “Rights, Robinson Crusoe, and Friday,” Independent Institute (Oct. 13, 2008)

• Alexander C., Reply to Roderick Long on Argumentation Ethics (September 17, 2021)
• Anonymous (Justopia), Exploding Argumentation Ethics (July 2020)
• Łukasz Dominiak, Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Argumentation Theory of Ethics(Mises Institute, July 19, 2019)
• PerfectSociety, Definitive Refutation of Hoppe’s “Argumentation Ethics”, reddit (Nov. 28, 2018)
• Cezary Błaszczyk, “The Critique of Copyright in Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics,” Studia Iuridica (2017)
• Johann von Brunswick, Neo-Hoppean Argumentation Ethics (January 5, 2018)
• Dave Burns, Argumentation Ethics steelman (July 5, 2018)
• ————, “What is incompatible with argumentation?,”Liberty Roadmap (Dec. 31, 2014)
• ————, “What did Hoppe’s critics miss?” (Dec 28, 2014)
• ————, “Hoppe questions” (Dec. 26, 2014)
• ————, “Frederick versus Hoppe” (Dec. 22, 2014)
• ————, “That which argumentation presupposes” (Dec. 15, 2014)
• ————, “We ought not argue” (Dec. 14, 2014)
• ————, “Who owns my brain?” (Dec. 12, 2014)
• ————, “Argumentation Presupposes Self-ownership” (Dec. 10, 2014)
• ————, “Understanding Hoppe” (Nov. 27, 2014)
• ————, “Reverse-engineering Hoppe” (Nov. 12, 2014)
• ————, “Notes on Long versus Hoppe” (Oct. 29, 2014)
• Christophe Cieters, “Nietzschean Libertarianism: The how and why of the free market morality” (Thesis Academiejaar 2009-2010, 2010)
• Kim Davies, The Transcendental Foundation of Ethics (1997)
  • see also idem, Review of K-O Apel, Towards a Transformation of Philosophy(1980), Radical Philosophy 30 Spring 1982
• Łukasz Dominiak, The Problem of Axiomatic Status of the Self-Ownership Principled in the Libertarian Political Philosophy, Athenium: Polskie Studia Politologiczne, vol. 54/2017, ss. 61–84.
• Hans-Hermann Hoppe vs Luiz Fabrette – on Argumentation Ethics and non-arguers
• Marian Eabrasu, “Rothbard’s and Hoppe’s justifications of libertarianism: A critique,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics Vol. 12, no. 3 (Aug. 1, 2013): 288–307
• Danny Frederick, “Hoppe’s Derivation of Self-Ownership from Argumentation: Analysis and Critique,” Reason Papers, Vol. 35, no. 1 (July 2013)
  • Spooner Bookman, “Critique of Danny Frederick’s Critique of Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Derivation of Self-Ownership from Argumentation” [he let this die and there is no archive]
• מדע אומלל, Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics: A User Friendly, Neighborly Introduction, (Dec. 25, 2011)
• Walter Block, “Rejoinder to Murphy and Callahan on Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics,” Journal of Libertarian Studies 22:1 (2011)
• Konrad Graf, “Action-Based Jurisprudence: Praxeological Legal Theory in Relation to Economic Theory, Ethics, and Legal Practice,” Libertarian Papers 3, 19 (Aug. 13, 2011)
• Share, Cade, A Defense of Rothbardian Ethics via A Mediation of Hoppe and Rand, Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, August 2012, p.117 [unfortunately paywalled; online at https://booksc dot org/book/51341942/48c87a ]
• James Ketler, Neo-Hoppean Argumentation Ethics (Jan. 5, 2018)
• Terrell, Timothy D.,  “Property Rights and Externality: The Ethics of the Austrian School,” Journal of Markets & Morality 2, no. 2 (Fall 1999): 197–207
• Janne Wilhelm & Florian Klugler, Hoppe’s Theory of Property Rights, Ethics, and UPB and How Do Morality, Emotions and Rational Thinking Fit Together? (PDF); and Bogdan Dabrowski, Mises’ Human Action & Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics applied to Psychology, Philosophy Europe Convention, Cryptoanarchy Institute, Prague (Sept. 12, 2015) [see also Bodgan Dabrowski, Praxeological Psychology, 27 February 2013];
• Young, Andrew T.. 2015. “Argumentation Ethics and the Question of Self-Ownership.”The Journal of Private Enterprise 30(3) Fall: 79–88.
  • van Dun, Frank. 2015. “Reply to Andrew Young’s “Argumentation Ethics and the Question of Self-Ownership”.” The Journal of Private Enterprise 30(3) Fall: 89–102.
• Argumentation Ethics: A Praxeological failure, by egoutilitarianism (kenshikenji) (March 7, 2016) (see also the corresonding YouTube video by Ego-Utilitarianism)

• Argumentation ethics (Wikipedia)
• “Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide” (2011) (Audio)
• KOL218 | Argumentation Ethics – Patterson in Pursuit
• KOL155 | “The Social Theory of Hoppe: Lecture 3: Libertarian Rights and Argumentation Ethics”
• “Argumentation Ethics, Estoppel, and Libertarian Rights: Adam Smith Forum, Moscow”
• “Argumentation Ethics, Estoppel, and Libertarian Rights: Transcript”
• “Libertarian Legal Theory: Property, Conflict, and Society: Lecture 1: Libertarian Basics: Rights and Law”
• “Libertarian Legal Theory: Property, Conflict, and Society: Lecture 2: Libertarian Basics: Rights and Law-Continued”