≡ Menu

Objectivists on Fractional Reserves

My post on NoodleFood is below in case they delete me:

I have learned a great deal about this topic from some debates among Austrians in the RAE and QJAE, e.g. (all available at www.mises.org if no link provided):

Hoppe: How is Fiat Money Possible?-or, The Devolution of Money and Credit

Rothbard: Aurophobia: or, Free Banking on What Standard? A Review of Gold, Greenbacks, and the Constitution, by Richard H. Timberlake

Hulsmann: Free Banking and the Free Bankers http://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae9_1_1.pdf
also: http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/18_3/18_3_3.pdf

Block: Hayek, Business Cycles, and Fractional Reserve Banking: Continuing the De-Homogenization Process

and on the other side:
Selgin & White’s In Defense of Fiduciary Media-or, We are Not Devo(lutionists), We are Misesians! http://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae9_2_5.pdf

As I mentioned in this thread discussing some Objectivist economic views ( http://blog.mises.org/archives/003091.asp ), unlike Hoppe, Hulsmann, Rothbard, Reisman, et al., I do not see fractional reserve banking as being necessarily *fraudulent*. As I wrote, “If it is disclosed clearly enough, I am not sure I see any fraudulent act being committed. I would need to be persuaded there is a given, concrete person who is a victim of fraud necessarily, due to fractional reserve banking–and a given coherent, precise definition of fraud given.”

That said, I am convinced by the arguments of these writers that fractional reserve banking makes no sense economically and could not work. To me, it is an attempt to get something for nothing; and it makes the mistake of conflating money (and the money supply) with actual wealth (e.g. produced goods). There is a difference between saved money, and invested money. If you want to let 90% of your “deposit” be “loaned out” fine, but then it is really a type of investment, not savings, and cannot be a genuine deposit.

{ 3 comments… add one }
  • Nir Graham June 27, 2009, 6:34 am

    Curious whether 3 years later on,
    you have further thoughts on this topic?

Leave a Reply

Next post:

Previous post:

Bad Behavior has blocked 4188 access attempts in the last 7 days.

© 2012-2019 StephanKinsella.com CC0 To the extent possible under law, Stephan Kinsella has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to material on this Site, unless indicated otherwise. In the event the CC0 license is unenforceable a  Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License is hereby granted.

-- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

%d bloggers like this: