Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 179.
Jeff Tucker and I discuss the recent copyright lawsuit over the “Blurred Lines” song by Robin Thicke and Pharrel.
Background and related:
From this post: “In the case of copyright, for example, J.D. Salinger, author of Catcher in the Rye, convinced U.S. courts to ban the publication of a novel called 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye.” And in Canada, when a grocery store in Canada mistakenly sold 14 copies of a new Harry Potter book a few days before its official release, a judge “ordered customers not to talk about the book, copy it, sell it or even read it before it is officially released at 12:01 a.m. July 16″ (on both cases, see Atlas Hefts: The Sequel!).”
- ‘Blurred Lines’ Jury Orders Pharrell, Robin Thicke to Pay $7.3 Million to Marvin Gaye Family
- ‘Blurred Lines’ verdict a blow to creative expression
- Did Robin Thicke steal ‘Blurred Lines’ from Marvin Gaye?
- GREAT, NOW “BLURRED LINES” HAS RUINED THE ENTIRE MUSIC INDUSTRY
- A Better Silence – John Cage and copyright
- Silent music dispute resolved
- Bob Dylan Makes the Case Against Today’s Copyright Climate
- Six songs, same tune? Mashup shows country’s similarities
- Tom Petty on Sam Smith Settlement: ‘No Hard Feelings. These Things Happen’